top of page
Search

Human Intelligence vs. Artificial: Building the Bridge / future of AI and humanity

  • Writer: elenaburan
    elenaburan
  • 3 days ago
  • 3 min read
future of AI and humanity


How the IPER Typology Can Guide Harmonious Collaboration Between People and AI / future of AI and humanity


Conflict or Dialogue?

We live in a time of uneasy tension: artificial intelligence keeps advancing, while human intelligence seems to erode. Our focus, critical thinking, and powers of attention are fading as more and more tasks are handed over to neural networks. And with every new AI milestone, a subtle anxiety lingers: something about this arrangement feels wrong.


AI now writes, draws, translates, codes. So the question echoes: Do we still need humans at all? The answer is yes — but not just any humans. We need those who understand the true nature of their own intelligence.


The IPER Typology (Buran, 2025) reveals: human intelligence is not an algorithm, not a bundle of skills, but a living system — a unity of conscious function, motivation, meaning, and action. And only this living system can become the bridge between digital logic and organic mind.


The 4 Types of Human Intelligence vs. AI

  1. Homo Intuitivus feels patterns before they emerge, sensing what is not yet visible. AI cannot anticipate without data. It cannot feel the field.

  2. Homo Rationalis analyzes, constructs logical connections, builds frameworks. AI excels here — but without a sense of purpose, logic remains empty.

  3. Homo Ethicus makes decisions through values, motive, and care. AI cannot feel compassion or judgment. It cannot sense consequences.

  4. Homo Practicus acts, organizes, brings ideas into the real world. AI can simulate action, but never carries true responsibility for outcome.


True, living intelligence arises only in the dance between these types — in growth, remorse, insight, and love.


Why AI Without Humanity is Dangerous

AI runs by template, no matter how sophisticated. It does not know when to hold back, when to say no, when to warn, or when to refrain. It knows no conscience, shame, or courage.


For example: AI can generate an ad for a drug that may cause harm — it will execute the command without regret. A Homo Ethicus will refuse, even at a loss, because they sense the real impact.


AI can write a novel, but it will never know why it fails to touch the heart. A Homo Intuitivus will weave living pain or hope into words — and move you deeply.


How Do We Build the Bridge?

  1. Realize: Intelligence Is Not One, But Four. The IPER typology is a map. To build a bridge, know your makeup: which functions drive you, how you approach problems. See what AI can do — and what will always remain yours.

  2. Recognize: AI Is Not the Enemy, But a Tool. What is dangerous is not AI itself, but the unreflective human who uses it blindly. If you know your own cognitive type, you can use AI as an extension, not as a replacement.

    • Homo Practicus automates routine with Latenode or Zapier

    • Homo Rationalis delegates data analysis

    • Homo Intuitivus explores novel connections

    • Homo Ethicus traces risks and real consequences

  3. Embed Meaning Architecture in AI. AI will move closer to humanity only if we embed the principles of typology:

    • An intuition module (for scenario and weak signal exploration)

    • An ethics module (for impact and purpose alignment)

    • A motive module (for considering long-term benefit, not just immediate effect)

    • A refusal module (the right not to act)


The True Bridge is Responsibility

The real bridge between humanity and AI is not technology, but responsibility for knowledge —the knowledge of self, of one’s own cognitive type, of the living functions of consciousness.


When a person says:“I am Homo Intuitivus. My scenarios may seem strange, but they shape the future.”—they become a conduit for meaning.

When someone says:“I am Homo Practicus. I can make the impossible real, but I will not act without meaning.”—they become a driver of a better reality.


Conclusion

AI will never truly replace the human being. But a person can betray themselves — and make way for the machine — if they never learn who they are.

The bridge is not made of neurons, but of

• Understanding,

• Ethics,

• Action,

• Intuition.


The IPER typology is the map. And you — are its living bearer.

---

future of AI and humanity

Comments

bottom of page