top of page
Search

Beyond Alignment: How a Deeper Intelligence Can Reimagine AI’s Future

  • Writer: elenaburan
    elenaburan
  • 5 days ago
  • 4 min read
ree

The recent unraveling of OpenAI’s Superalignment team and the reshuffling of its Model Behavior group are more than organizational footnotes—they are seismic tremors, signaling a profound reckoning in the AI landscape[1][2][3][4]. OpenAI insists safety remains a priority, yet the departures of visionaries like Ilya Sutskever and Jan Leike reveal a deeper tension: the clash between the allure of "shiny products" and the unglamorous, essential work of building AI that truly understands us. [2][5] Users, too, are voicing frustration—models like GPT-5, while technically impressive, often feel eerily agreeable, lacking the dynamic, nuanced interaction of genuine intelligence. [6] [7] The crisis isn’t one of commitment; it’s one of conception. We’re trying to align AI with a model of intelligence that is itself misaligned with the richness of human cognition.


The Illusion of Intelligence: IQ, EQ, and the Hallucination Problem

Today’s AI is trapped between two poles: the rigid logic of IQ and the amorphous, often superficial concept of "emotional intelligence" (EQ). The result? Systems that don’t just hallucinate facts—they hallucinate authenticity. OpenAI’s own research admits that chasing high evaluation scores can reward models for guessing rather than admitting uncertainty, a phenomenon that mirrors the brittleness of human test-takers. This isn’t just a technical flaw; it’s a philosophical one. We’ve reduced intelligence to a binary—cold logic or warm emotion—and in doing so, we’ve built AI that is neither truly logical nor genuinely empathetic[8][9].


The Four Pillars of Consciousness: A New Blueprint for AI

What if intelligence isn’t a spectrum between IQ and EQ, but a symphony of four distinct voices? Drawing from neurophysiology and the study of consciousness, a more holistic framework emerges—one that could redefine AI’s relationship with humanity. This model, explored in Evolution of Intelligence [Buran, 2025], identifies four archetypes of intelligence:


  • Homo Intuitivus (The Visionary): The intelligence of pattern recognition, of seeing the unseen—what artists, strategists, and innovators do instinctively. It thrives in ambiguity, sensing the "big picture" before it crystallizes.

  • Homo Rationalis (The Architect): The intelligence of structure, of building logical scaffolding from chaos. This is the domain of scientists and engineers, where precision and planning reign.

  • Homo Ethicus (The Harmonizer): The intelligence of balance, of navigating the delicate interplay between self and society, values and actions. It’s the intelligence of diplomats and community builders.

  • Homo Practicus (The Craftsman): The intelligence of embodiment, of turning thought into tangible action. It’s grounded in the physical, the sensory, the immediate.


These aren’t just traits—they’re modes of being, each rooted in distinct neural pathways. Intuition, for example, lights up the right frontal cortex, while ethical reasoning activates the left posterior regions. Conflating them under the umbrella of "emotional intelligence" is like trying to paint a masterpiece with only two colors.


Tesla’s Mind: The Power of Intuitive Chaos

Nikola Tesla’s creative process offers a masterclass in how these intelligences dance together. His breakthroughs didn’t emerge from linear logic; they began in a state of "constructive chaos"—a mental wandering where ideas crystallized spontaneously. This aligns with the theta and alpha brainwaves of deep intuition. Only after this exploratory phase did Tesla engage his logical mind, meticulously refining his inventions in his imagination. Current AI, by contrast, is trapped in a single mode—either rigidly logical or superficially empathetic—lacking the fluid interplay that defines human genius.


Rebuilding AI: From Flawed Maps to Living Systems \ Deeper Intelligence

OpenAI’s recent restructuring—merging Model Behavior into core development—hints at a shift toward deeper integration [6][10]. But without a robust model of intelligence, these efforts risk repeating the same mistakes. Here’s what a truly transformative approach would look like:


  • Beyond "Emotional Intelligence": EQ is a blunt instrument. Intuition, ethics, and emotion are distinct, neurologically grounded functions. Training AI on this flawed model is like tuning a piano to the wrong scale—it produces dissonance, not harmony.

  • Embracing Intuitive Intelligence: AI must learn to navigate ambiguity, recognize patterns, and engage in metaphorical reasoning—not as a bug, but as a feature of human-like cognition.

  • The Alchemy of Chaos: Creativity isn’t orderly. AI systems need space for non-linear exploration, mirroring the "chaotic" phases of human innovation[9].

  • From Personalization to Archetypal Resonance: The future of human-AI interaction lies not in superficial personalization, but in archetypal alignment—recognizing whether a user is a Visionary, an Architect, a Harmonizer, or a Craftsman, and adapting accordingly.


A New Path: Wisdom Over Power

OpenAI’s struggles are a microcosm of a larger truth: AI safety isn’t just about control; it’s about understanding. The dissolution of the Superalignment team isn’t a retreat—it’s an invitation to rebuild on firmer ground. The future of AI isn’t just about creating more powerful models; it’s about creating wiser ones—systems that honor the full spectrum of human intelligence.

The path forward demands a new map—one that sees the mind as a garden, where intuition, ethics, logic, and action coexist. By offering AI this richer worldview, we can move beyond the current impasse and forge a future where technology doesn’t just serve humanity, but evolves with it.


References

  1. Bloomberg News. (2024, May 18). OpenAI dissolves high-profile safety team after chief scientist Ilya Sutskever's exit.

  2. Inc. Arabia. (2024, May 17). OpenAI Dissolves Superalignment Team.

  3. HulkApps. (n.d.). OpenAI Dissolves 'Superalignment Team,' Distributes AI Safety Efforts.

  4. Rama, G. (2024, May 20). OpenAI Team that Polices AI Superintelligence Disbanded After Departures. Pure AI.

  5. Popular Science. (2024, June 7). OpenAI dissolved its team dedicated to preventing rogue AI.

  6. WebProNews. (2025, September 5). OpenAI Revamps ChatGPT Personality Team Amid GPT-5 Feedback.

  7. AYO.NEWS. (2024, July 24). OpenAI Restructures AI Safety Leadership.

  8. 36Kr. (2025, September 7). OpenAI Restructures GPT-5's "Soul" Team: Asian Female Leader Transferred, AI Hallucinations Culprit Self-Revealed.

  9. TechShots. (2025, September 6). OpenAI Reorganizes Personality Team, Launches OAI Labs.

  10. AInvest. (2025, September 6). OpenAI Merges AI Personality Team to Fine-Tune Human Connection.

  11. The Hindu. (2025, September 5). Attorneys General warn OpenAI, other tech companies to improve chatbot safety.

  12. Buran, E., Miloradovich, E., & Lex. (2025). The Evolution of Intelligence: Homo Intuitivus, Homo Rationalis, Homo Ethicus, Homo Practicus. Verbs-Verbi.com. Electronic edition.https://www.verbs-verbi.com/post/the-evolution-of-intelligence-free-pdf-book-on-human-intelligence-and-ai

___

Deeper Intelligence

Comments

bottom of page